Dr. Wegman’s Deathday

~Can you hear the name of light?
In every finite body lusters the star
Of immortality. All things call out for adoration & respect.
In each child an old man lies dying,
And in old men fresh children are singing.
The sky is unbound.
And the quiet that settles on our skin before dawn
Keeps company with those whose dreams are troubled.

4 March 2023 “Speaking with the Stars”: Venus (occult Mercury) & Jupiter are now 3° apart in the west in early evening. On the opposite side of the sky in the east, the bright waxing gibbous Moon forms a tall isosceles triangle with Regulus &orange Gamma Leonis (Algieba) under it.

Rudolf Steiner’s Lectures on this day 


Meditation given to Ita Wegman from Rudolf Steiner

1943 – Death day of Dr. Ita Wegman co-founder of Anthroposophical Medicine with Rudolf Steiner. In 1921, she founded the first anthroposophical medical clinic in Arlesheim, Switzerland.

Ita Wegman, was born in Karawang, West Java, the first child of a Dutch colonial family. Around the turn of the century, she went to Europe & studied therapeutic gymnastics & massage. In 1902, when she was 26, she met Rudolf Steiner, who encouraged her to become a medical doctor. She began at the University of Zurich, where women were allowed to study medicine.

She developed a special form of massage therapy, called rhythmical massage, & other therapeutic treatments. In 1917, having opened an independent practice, she developed a cancer treatment using an extract of mistletoe following indications from Steiner. This first remedy, which she called Iscar, was later developed into Iscador & has become an important cancer treatment

By 1919 she had a joint practice together with two other doctors, also women. In 1920 she purchased land in Arlesheim, where she opened her own clinic, the Klinisch-Therapeutisches Institut, or Clinical-Therapeutic Institute, the next year. A number of other doctors joined the institute, which grew steadily over the next years as a first center for anthroposophical medicine. In 1922 she founded a therapeutic home for mentally handicapped children, Haus Sonnenhof, also in Arlesheim, & co-founded a pharmaceutical laboratory, Weleda, that has since grown into a significant producer of medicines & health-care products.

Ita Wegman Aleksandar | WortMihael / Rudolf Steiner / Antropozofija

In the following year, Rudolf Steiner asked Wegman to join the Executive Council of the newly reformed Anthroposophical Society at the Goetheanum in Dornach, Switzerland. Steiner also named her as the head of the First Class of the School of Spiritual Science. She also directed the Medical Section of the research center at the Goetheanum.

Together, Wegman & Steiner wrote what was to be Steiner’s last book, Extending Practical Medicine (earlier editions were published as Fundamentals of Therapy), which gave a theoretical basis to the new medicine they were developing. The book was partly written while Wegman cared for Steiner, who was already terminally ill.

For many years of Rudolf Steiner gave Ita Wegman meditations & clues to help unlock her memory of their past incarnations together, ever leaving her freedom. Finally on that fatal NYE 100 years ago, as she stood with Steiner watching the 1st Goetheanum burn, a flash of their lives together in Ephesus was revealed…After that she was able to develop that capacity to recall her former incarnations. And in the evening lectures of the Christmas Conference – ‘World History in the Light of Anthroposophy’ – Steiner spoke about their incarnations as Gilgamesh & Eaboni & Aristotle & Alexander.      

After Steiner’s death Wegman founded a new medical journal, Natura, the following year. In 1936, the clinic opened a second home in Ascona, Switzerland. Shortly thereafter, difficulties between Wegman & the rest of the Executive Council flared up, & Wegman was asked to leave the Council; in addition, she & a number of supporters had their membership in the Anthroposophical Society itself withdrawn.

Her medical work & personal inner development flourished, however, & Wegman travelled extensively in support of the rapidly growing movement to extend medicine’s limits; she was especially active in the Netherlands & England during this time.

Dr. Ita Wegman died in Arlesheim in 1943, at the age of 67.

Memory Pictures of Ita Wegman on her Death Day by Norbet Glas, the founder of the Lucas Clinic next to the Wegman Clinic in Arlesheim:

‘The request to write about Dr. Wegman has moved me deeply and given me such cause for thought. I have come to the conclusion that there must be very few people whose personality is so difficult to describe as hers. For example, to write a personal account of Dr. Wegman, one must have the gift to create a real and vivid life picture in any description of her. For such she always was : full of a natural, unquenchable source of life – a complete human being, with all the truly human qualities. And such people are admired by many, loved by many, but also misunderstood and even hated by many. Who, then, is right?Like an answer to this question a memory-picture arises of Dr. Wegman in a room with Rudolf Steiner. Her figure was erect; she was wearing a brightly colored dress. With shining eyes she watched a little group of doctor-friends who had gathered together there. I observe Rudolf Steiner keenly. Never had I seen him like this. He looked at her with an infinitely loving expression. He seemed to me like a father who, with admiration and respect was watching his grown up daughter, and at the same time was very proud of her.With this picture in mind, one knows for certain, that as long as confidence in Rudolf Steiner remains, one must think of Dr. Wegman too, with admiration and thankfulness.

Simpler pictures ruse up in my memory: the breakfast table in the early days of the Arlesheim Clinic. There of us often sat there together. She was generally first, and waited for us. She did not like one to come late, though I hardly ever heard a direct remark about it. She often read the morning newspaper with the greatest interests, and I know that this rather surprised me. It had been my opinion that Anthroposophists concerned themselves very little with newspapers! But it was characteristic of her, that she had the greatest interest in everything that was happening in the world. It seemed to her just as important to read the Basler Nachrichten as to hear the reports about the patients from us or from the nurses. At times, indeed, something like indignation came over me that she seemed to be more interested in an article in the newspaper than in the report of the night nurse. She did not pay attention to the report, but read and read, and only when she had finished, asked the nurse to repeat it.

Her absolute unwearied activity in those days could only be marveled at. She organized the new Clinic, and saw the patients who were living in; she visited those outside; she held regular consultations in Basle at that time, in the afternoons. She concerned herself with the production of medicines and evolved plans for making them widely known. Her head was full of ideas for the Curative Education Institutes just being established. She sought for connections with many people, and developed these. And with the ingenuousness of someone who is herself unassuming, and asks for nothing for herself personally, she often convinced people how they could put their money to the right use, as she indeed hoped it was. No one can be surprised that many such undertakings went wrong. But she never grew weary of beginning again to discover fresh ways.

In the evenings she often went to Rudolf Steiner, told him of her experiences, asked his advice and listened to what he wished of her. She was late in coming back and we waited for her. Often she told us then what she wished and what Rudolf Steiner had advised. Her great sense of humour was one of her delightful qualities and hardly anyone in the Clinic could laugh as heartily as she. And as a keen observer, she found very many opportunities for laughter. I can still almost hear her hearty laughter when she once heard me trying awkwardly to say something in Swiss-German dialect to a patient from the village. If she had a plan in her mind, she tried every way to bring her thoughts to realization. She wanted to try it with everybody, expecting from each the capabilities that were necessary. She was eager to carry it through, and she had confidence in people. If they did not go with her, she soon let the matter drop, without being annoyed with them for long. The proposal was suddenly made to me once (I was then quite young) to become the director of a business. I felt neither the inclination nor had I the slightest ability to fill such a post. (At that time I had only contempt for everything in the business world.) she described to me in glowing colors how well I could do it. I did not wish to undertake it and she realized this at once. I spent a sleepless night. What should I do? The next morning I saw Dr. Wegman again. She was friendly and interested, as always – but nothing more was said about the ‘directorship’ – never a word more.

And here let another quality of hers be called to mind which I have hardly ever seen so wonderfully developed in anyone else: if people did not do what she asked, or behaved unfairly towards her, she never held it against them for long. She could be overpoweringly angry, so angry that one could only be astonished at it, but in a short time it was all over, and she was always ready to hold out the hand of reconciliation. She was so untiringly active that she never gave herself time really to feel seriously hurt. She was filled with a glowing will-power which communicated itself to others. Her one great wish was that the scientific world should recognize the significance of Anthroposophy. She thought that by far the best way would be to let the scientists make direct contact with Rudolf Steiner. In the last years of Rudolf Steiner’s life he came to Vienna. In the morning, Dr. Wegman talked over with us the possibility of arranging a meeting with the greatest scientists of Vienna. That was her plan. And we were so delighted, and so fired with her impulse that we let everything else stand aside, and did nothing but go in search of people who seemed to us important. We invited them, and tried to convince them that they would be missing a rare opportunity if they did not come to our meeting that evening. We succeeded, and Rudolf Steiner came together in the evening with the most eminent doctors and scientists of Vienna; he gave an address, followed by a discussion until late into the night which none of those present will ever have forgotten. She was so untiring in her efforts to carry Rudolf Steiner’s teaching far out into the world, because she felt the menacing approach of world catastrophes. Rudolf Steiner himself had given enough warning of it, and consciousness of the threatening evils would not let her rest.

Women as active as she often begin to display a certain hardness, and pride themselves on their virility. This was never so with Dr. Wegman; one was always aware of great womanhood. She never tried to imitate men, either, in her broad minded thinking. In fact, she lived entirely in certain plans for the future, as to how a great medical and pedagogical movement, on the basis of Rudolf Steiner’s ideas, might be brought to realization. In the realizing of these ideas, she would allow nothing to disturb her. And the many ‘clever’ men, who so often wanted to show her, by rigid logic, how impossible everything would be or what mistakes she had made – all these she really disliked, and was bored by them. People were offended by this trait in her, for they did not understand it. She would not allow her ardour to be quenched or her untiring zeal to make good use of the time as long as it was still possible to do something. If she had spoken her mind, however, to the person concerned, and he had been very vexed, she was truly sorry. But she would bear with no narrowness, and therefore could not endure certain qualities, such as egoism, vanity, and – most of all – stupidity. If she had been very angry and had spoken in a temperamental way, she would suddenly stop, begin to laugh, and say: ‘But really, it is so stupid!’ And usually it was very stupid. She simply hated that kind of logic by which the spirit is restricted.

She had in her something of a power with which she could make the impossible possible. This is needed in true medical work and she had this will to heal as no one else. This fire in her nature stimulated the doctors who were round her, and for that we shall be eternally thankful to her. She was ready to help at any moment. If she was not immediately ready with the advice she wanted to give, she went to Rudolf Steiner, asked him and at once brought the answer. In Vienna I often received word from her within twenty four hours from Basle as to what to do in this or that case. Like all magnanimous people, she was full of praise and appreciation for good work. I remember how she came once to one of the Homes which indeed had been founded at her suggestion, but had not yet been seen in full working order. In the morning – having arrived the night before – she looked all round, and said, with warm admiration: ‘I could not have believed that Rudolf Steiner would be so alive here!’ And she praised everything. We even felt that it was more than we deserved. But it was such a joy for her when something succeeded, that she found no limits to her praise. Those who accompanied her were not always too pleased about this! But if she noticed it – and she generally did notice – then she made a point of expressing her appreciation all the more!

The last time I was able to see her – shortly before the outbreak of war – she seemed to have greatly changed. One felt a great power of peace flowing from her. But it was no longer the earthly, warrior-nature which used formerly to show itself: now it was deep pain and wisdom. She wanted to help everyone for whom there was something she could do. More people from Germany and Austria asked help from her than she could undertake. How moved she was when one day I brought to her a doctor from Vienna who had fled and waded through a stream in the night, so as to be able to cross the border at an unguarded spot! He possessed nothing but his soaked clothes, and he was quite destitute. She had never seen the man before. All her warm heartedness broke through at such a moment and she did everything that was possible at that time. Long afterwards this doctor wrote with admiration of our ‘Colleague’ at Arlesheim.

If these few pictures from her life help to indicated something of the character of Dr. Wegman, the aim and intention of the writer is achieved. Their purpose has been to bring to remembrance those great human qualities which made her want to lead us towards lofty goals.’

~Norbet Glas, Gloucester, England

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is Ita-wegemann.jpg

1868 – Birthday of Harry Collison, the 1st General Secretary of the British Anthroposophical Society. In his early days Collison was a Freemason & Theosophist, he founded a group called the ‘Myrdhin’ Group, which was then renamed the ‘Zarathustra’ Group, at the suggestion of Rudolf Steiner.

Collison translated many of Steiner’s works into English, & was involved with the arrangements for many summer conferences held at Oxford, feathering ‘eurhythmy’ in the hall of Keble College.I n 1914 Collison arranged for several performers from Dornach to visit the UK & demonstrate the art to the study groups. The performers were Lori Maier-Smits, her younger sister Ada, Elisabeth Dollfus & Flossy von Sonklar. His exposure to eurhythmy had begun the previous year, when he had participated in the premier of f Steiner’s mystery play, The Soul’s Awakening, put on in Munich. Collison was one of the gnomes.

Even with his heavy involvement with Anthroposophy from 1910, Collison did not give up his artistic interest; in fact he described his subsequent career as “fairly successful”

Due to its continued loud support for Wegman & Vreede, the Anthroposophical Society in Great Britain was expelled from the General Anthroposophical Society in 1935. The British Society finally rejoined the General Anthroposophical Society in 1963.

He was variously described by those who knew him as charming, humorous, whimsical & genial, a delightful companion with whom to take a walk in the country or a tour of an art gallery, a provider of wise advice & counsel. He could also be excitable in conversation, authoritarian in his approach to dealing with issues & curt in manner if he lost patience. As Marie Steiner von Sivers, wrote, he enjoyed a rich life.

The Categories of Aristotle – a process of contraction…
Is there a path to expansion…..?


Friday 24 March 2023 – Lecture 7 pm CT – 8:30 pm – Purchase tickets at the door or pay online

Saturday 25 March 2023 – Workshop – 9 am CT– (10:30 am 1/2 hour break – 11 am) 12:30 pm CT CT– Purchase tickets at the door or pay online $50

The Categories of AristotleA process of contraction…exploring a path to expansion

Does one have to be a philosopher of great erudition to approach Aristotle’s gift to humanity……his Categories?

Perhaps , YES! But an initial acquaintance with them can lead out of the confinement of the intellectual concept to an experience of expansion supported by Eurythmy.

In the evening lecture Claudia will introduce the life of the Categories before they became concepts – Bringing the symbols in a sequence of sounds  (called the Evolutionary Sequence ) out of their conceptual form, to life, supported by Eurythmy and examples of poetry.

During the workshop we will enter into the movement of the poetry presented  during the lecture. This will be accessible to Eurythmists as well as to anyone interested in the life of language, poetry and our alphabet.

at the Rudolf Steiner Branch of The Anthroposophical Society
4249 North Lincoln Avenue. Chicago, IL 60618 (map)

For more info contact Cultural Events & Festivals Coordinator
Hazel Archer-Ginsberg

Claudia Fontana saw a Eurythmy performance when still a teenager. Unbeknownst to her at the time, that performance was the gate to her destiny path. Soon thereafter she studied Eurythmy in Vienna and subsequently spent fourteen years as a performer with the Dornach, London and Stuttgart Eurythmeum ensembles. Teaching became the next challenge which she happily met in the United States, Europe. Before Covid, she spent seven years teaching all levels in Thailand, Malaysia and China. She resides in Ann Arbor, MI still performing and teaching.

Mary Magdalene & the Women at the Tomb – A Festival of Resurrection

with Hazel Archer-Ginsberg,

Song-Circle with Velsum, 

Eurythmy – & an artistic break out session

Holy Saturday 8 April 2023

1 pm – 3pm CT hybrid event in-person at the Rudolf Steiner Branch Chicago & on zoom


Meeting ID: 705 017 4041

For more Info. contact Hag@RSChicago.org Cultural Events & Festivals Coordinator
Rudolf Steiner Branch 4249 North Lincoln Avenue, Chicago, IL 60618 (map)


The Mystery of Ascension with Hazel Archer-Ginsberg

This course is available on Zoom. You will be emailed a Zoom link closer to the time of the class. The course will be recorded and you will receive a link to watch it. Go to the Infinity Foundation web site to enroll

Course Number 231154 / Zoom
Date: Thursday, May 11
Time 7:00 – 8:30 PM CST
Cost $33/23 payment 10 days in advance

Gerald Shepherd

When we tune into the Cycle of the Seasons, we experience that as the Earth breathes out in the Springtime, the beings of nature reach upwards towards the heights. The longing of the human soul also strives to meet this mood of ascension, which attunes all life to the cosmic expanses.

Together we will gain insights in how to rise up to our Higher Self by participating in this harmonizing spring-dialogue between the worlds.

This reconnection between heaven & earth was prefigured in the story of Jacob’s ladder from the Old Testament. Through his dream of the ‘stairway to heaven’, Jacob gave us a prophecy in the picture of a golden ladder on which choirs of Angels traverse between the ‘Above & Below’. The Mystery of the Ascension of Christ, 40 days after the Resurrection at Easter, fulfilled Jacob’s Prophecy. Christ as the Being of Love became the living bridge connecting us to the eternal.

Through this workshop we will learn how humanity will also be transfigured in the fullness of time. The company of the Angelic Hierarchies wait for us, their younger siblings, to ascend, first of all in our thinking, to meet them in fellowship, as they work all the while by our sides.

Nancy Poer

~Vitae Sophia~A Whitsun Festival of United Soul Endeavor 

with Hazel Archer-Ginsberg, Velsum Voices & Eurythmy

Saturday 27 May 2023 a Hybrid event in person* & on zoom

We are called to redeem the ether spheres to create an Ecclesia, a chalice for The Sophia. Then the spirit flame can spread out to become what Steiner called a “World Whitsun”, which began in earnest at the Christmas Conference. The Whitsun Festival highlights one of the greatest challenges of being human: placing our individual gifts, in right relationship within the social realm. This challenge is especially strong now during this ‘pandemic’. Our groups striving to know Spiritual Science must work together as a community, to have the possibility to create a new culture where a sacrament is possible in every encounter. Our individual strength is enhanced by weaving our gifts together, kindling our social world in conscious community.

Zoom: https://us06web.zoom.us/j/83663366670?pwd=L292UzlOR1pkZjBXSWpxK1B2b0o1dz09 Meeting ID: 836 6336 6670 / Passcode: 397593

For more Info. contact Hag@RSChicago.org Cultural Events & Festivals Coordinator
*Rudolf Steiner Branch 4249 North Lincoln Avenue, Chicago, IL 60618 (mapwww.rschicago.org/donate

Find a collection of the many RECORDINGS of Presentations, Programs & Festivals HERE

23 thoughts on “Dr. Wegman’s Deathday

  1. Hazel, thank-you for your offerings about the spirit that was Ida Wegman. How precious that Rudolf Steiner had/has such a friend. That spirit is an inspiration . . . to love the truth with all.

  2. Dear Hasel, thank you for your precisious articles. I’d like to ask you, how could you find a Hungarian writing under the first picture of the Arlesheim’s Clinc(Klinika)?
    I was really surprise about is!🙂
    Georgina , who read you from years from Hungary

    1. Greetings dear Georgina – You know I find these images all over mostly from the internet, sometimes folks send me things or i take a photo from a book.
      I’m not sure where the Clinic photo came from. I’m so gald it got you to reach out!
      Blessings to you there in Hungary.
      I would love to come out some day…

  3. In Rudolf Steiner’s final volume of Karmic Relationships, he mentions a final incarnation of Aristotle and Alexander together, before they separate in order to further Christianity in their own individual ways. This would seem to imply that Ita Wegman and Rudolf Steiner could not be the reincarnation of Alexander and Aristotle in the 19th-20th century. Yet, there is nothing to prevent the idea that Rudolf Steiner is the reincarnation of Aristotle, and maybe even Alexander. I have been working on this for years, and it oscillates back and forth. Suffice to say that if Steiner could not reveal more about this final incarnation of A & A together in the last volume of KR, wherein he points directly to many other interesting incarnations, then he is refraining from doing so because it concerns his own spiritual biography, and there is an occult law about this which cannot be crossed.

    Here is this very veiled remark coming from lecture 3, and after describing the legacy of Haroun al Raschid and his Counsellor, who fostered Arabism into the western world:

    “Out of spiritual research, Haroun al Raschid and his counsellor lived on, having passed through the gate of death as I just indicated, and needless to say, Alexander and Aristotle themselves lived on. Once only they paid as it were a fleeting visit to the earth in the first Christian centuries in a district not without interest for the Anthroposophical Movement. Then they returned again into the spiritual world and they were together in the spiritual world at a certain time after Haroun al Raschid and his counsellor had left the physical plane once more. They themselves, the real individualities of Aristotle and Alexander, took different paths from Haroun al Raschid and his counsellor. For they went forward with the Christian evolution. They went westward with the evolution of Christianity.”


    This district of interest to the Anthroposophical Movement is the one designated as Palestine, or the Holy Land, and involved the time of Christ Himself. You see, it only follows in the legacy of what is first described as Gilgamesh and Eabani, and their later incarnation together at the Mystery of Ephesus, and then as Aristotle and Alexander, that these two were destined to meet the Christ at the pivotal moment in time. It was the culmination of their holy alliance, going back to the Hibernian Mystery found there in Austria, c. 2900 BC. Thus, they engaged as symbiotic twins, of sorts, and were determined to experience all the downward-tending events leading to the pivotal moment in time, which was the entry of Christ into Earth evolution. Destiny has never seen such a finer pair. Steiner refers to it in GA 233.

    1. It is clear to me that These individualities were not on earth during Christ’s incarnation but were in the sphere of the Sun with Michael & the other souls connected to the Aristotelian stream

      1. It is clear to me that They were on Earth, and in very significant incarnations involving the great turning point of Time. Hopefully, we won’t have to just agree to disagree. This is a pivotal shakedown moment.

          1. Part of the mystery concerns Aristotle being twice the age of Alexander. I think I mentioned this before and you found it insignificant. In the life together at the time of Christ this is switched. Yes, pretty quaking and shaking for those with the ears to hear 🙂

            1. Being occupied by the calling of my own muses & the demands of the various angelic beings,
              I don’t always have the where with all to follow all the sundry theories & divergent breadcrumbs …

              1. I think I understand your calling as we engage now for a 5th consecutive Lenten season. No, it is not the daughter of Jairus, and the woman with the Hemorrhage. They are the reincarnated Ruth and Naomi of the Book of Ruth. Maybe I’ll just sweep my threshing floor of its crumbs and call it a day. I would be doing a disservice to the Gods if I were to say anything more. Suffice to say, it was a brief in scope, but lasting for the future.

              2. I have asked for clarity which the gods also hold dear, not more crumbs. But of course it is for you to hold or sweep away as you will.

              3. “sundry theories & divergent breadcrumbs” is what you called it. Clarity is why I have been specifying scripture a lot lately. We’ll get there with patience and goodwill. You see, I’m living everyday with a renewed enthusiasm as I savor the countdown to April 1st, and Lazarus Saturday. Thanks for showing that you’re still interested.

              4. It is possible to show that Aristotle is the forerunner of John the Baptist, and this is very important in seeing, and even conceptualizing, how Aristotle and Alexander reincarnated together one last time when Christ incarnated on Earth.

                John is noted for saying something which the priests and Levites likely failed to understand when he said it. After inquiring of John about who he is, and why he is baptizing, he says:

                “I am not the Christ.” 21 They asked him, “What then? Are you Elijah?” And he said, “I am not.” “Are you the Prophet?” And he answered, “No.” 22 Then they said to him, “Who are you, so that we may give an answer to those who sent us? What do you say about yourself?” 23 He said, “I am a voice of one crying in the wilderness, ‘Make straight the way of the Lord,’ as Isaiah the prophet said.” John 1

                Now, it can be shown that Aristotle left Plato’s Academy in 347 BC, after twenty years, in order to do the very same thing that John was pleading. He left the security of the Academy in order to work toward achieving the three-dimensional realm of subject-object distinctions on Earth, which coincides exactly with Isaiah’s prophecy to “make straight the way of the Lord; make His plains level”, ref. Isaiah, 40:3. All four Gospels depict this saying, and so it must be very important.

                Then, Aristotle gives instruction to the young Alexander, who, in suffering the demands of Aristotle’s intensified thinking, has the epiphany of the complete remembrance of his recent former life at the Mystery of Ephesus. He becomes a self-realized human being, and that is why he was able to conquer nations. He did so through spreading the “Aristotelian Knowledge of Nature” to the four directions. It harkens back to Moses, who, after experiencing the’Burning Bush’, and the fire on Mount Sinai, met the God of Nature and the Elements. Need I say more; the parallels are extraordinary.


                “Aristotle awakened in Alexander all that Gilgamesh had passed through when he undertook the journey over to the West. And the result of it was that his pupil could perceive in direct inner experience what is felt in the direction of North-West, in the intermediate zone between Moist and Cold: — Water. A man like Alexander not merely could, but did actually speak in such a manner as not to say: There goes the road to the North-West — but instead: There goes the road to where the element of Water holds dominion. In the intermediate zone between Moist and Warm lies the element where the Air holds dominion.” GA 233, Lecture IV

              5. Yes, the gestures are very evocative.
                I love these interactive links to the art work.
                What do each of their books say, I can’t make it out?

              6. So interesting about the books depicted – thank you.

                And in his incarnation as Rudolf Steiner he transformed the dodecahedron into the Foundation Stone of Love

                BTW: Did you receieve the post for today?
                I am having tech difficulties again & it did not come to me, so I don’t know if it even went out…?

              7. Yes, I got it but am curious about it. Who is that in the center of the picture with Lenin to the right?

              8. So strange that the post did not come to my email, CG sidn’t get it either…hmmm…It seems I am up againist some nasty gremlins, even my phone is wonky…

                not sure what Dieago was going for in his painting…

              9. While we agree that Aristotle was the creator of the Dodecahedron, and this model of the universe predicted his very next, and final life with Alexander, there are difficulties with your array here of the past incarnations.


                It can be proven that Cratylus was not at Ephesus, but rather, a younger contemporary of Socrates. He was a Heraclitean, indeed, but not at the school of Ephesus in its time. As well, Thomas Aquinas is not the reincarnated Aristotle, and maybe this is most important. While Lamprecht the Priest can be shown to be the reincarnation of Alexander, Thomas Aquino had a more dynamic and mysterious relationship to Aristotle. As such, he represents the 12th in the College of Twelve, and related to the birth of Christian Rosenkreutz, who is the reincarnated Aristotle, by way of Lazarus.

                Yes, I am blurting it out at this point, but maybe it will make a difference. Citing scriptural authority ever day doesn’t seem to work much here in this venue. Now, we are on our way; onward and upward.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.